Addressing Questions Around the Morant Bay Center and Political Accountability.

By: Wayne Forbes /GTV Editor

February 18, 2026

Addressing Questions Around the Morant Bay Center and Political Accountability.

The recent demand by Opposition Spokesman on Industry Anthony Hylton for Prime Minister Andrew Holness to clarify reports on the Morant Bay Urban Center in Saint Thomas raises important questions not just about the project itself, but about the nature of political accountability in Jamaica. While scrutiny of government initiatives is a core function of the opposition, this particular call warrants critical examination in light of the project’s public timeline.

The Visible Reality of an Unfinished Project

It was clear to observers at the time of the ribbon-cutting ceremony that the Morant Bay Center was not fully completed. Images from the event, local media coverage, and community discussions all documented that key elements of the urban center remained under construction. This was not hidden information – it was apparent to anyone who engaged with the project, including political representatives across the spectrum. For the People’s National Party (PNP) opposition to now call for clarification in response to a "recent nationwide report" suggests either a lack of attention to ongoing developments at the time, or a strategic decision to raise concerns only when it serves political purposes.

Accountability Must Be Consistent

Political accountability cannot be selective. If the opposition believes transparency is critical for infrastructure projects, that standard should apply at all stages – not just when a report brings renewed attention to an issue. The Morant Bay Center was positioned as a flagship development for Saint Thomas, designed to boost local economy and improve public services. When the ceremony was held before completion, it would have been appropriate for the opposition to raise questions then about timelines, budget allocations, and the rationale for marking a milestone before work was finished. Waiting until a later report surfaces undermines the credibility of concerns about accountability, framing them as reactive politics rather than principled oversight.

The Government’s Responsibility Remains

That said, the Holness administration bears its own burden of accountability. While the incomplete state of the center was public knowledge, the government has an obligation to provide regular updates on progress, explain any delays or cost adjustments, and ensure that public funds are being used effectively. The fact that questions persist about the project’s status indicates a failure to maintain consistent communication with the public and with oversight bodies. This lack of proactive transparency creates space for political maneuvering, allowing both sides to prioritize point-scoring over delivering results for the people of Saint Thomas.

Moving Beyond Political Posturing

The people of Jamaica deserve better than a cycle of delayed criticism and inadequate communication. The Morant Bay Center has the potential to be a transformative asset for the region – but only if all political actors focus on its successful completion rather than using it as a tool for political gain. The opposition should explain why concerns were not raised earlier, and outline concrete steps it would take to improve infrastructure project management if in power. The government must commit to regular, detailed updates on the center’s progress and address any legitimate questions about its delivery.

True accountability requires both sides to apply consistent standards, act in a timely manner, and keep the public’s interests at the forefront of their actions.